Hello. I was reading some old posts and Robert Lee said that the auspicious steps are: "The only issue to consider is the number of steps. ie Auspicious Steps are like:- 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20. So if the no of steps is in the auspicious no of steps, then it should not be an issue. Hope that helps. Warmest Regards Robert Lee" --------------------------------------------------- I believe Robert was referring to the three-step cycle in counting steps. However, in one of your old posts in 2002, you said that ?there is also the four-step cycle to consider in counting steps. http://forum.geomancy.net/phpforum/article.php?bid=2&fid=1&mid=12351&new= So ?in effect, the following numbers are the auspicious numbers considering both the three-step cycle and four-step cycle: 1,2, 5, 10, 13, 14, 17, 22, 25, 26 etc... My question is: Since Robert did not include the four-step cycle in his computation for auspicious steps, does it mean that the three-step cycle is ?more important than the four-step cycle when counting steps?